Volvo 850 1996 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 850 engine produces 98 HP more power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Toyota Camry. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is smaller. Volvo 850 is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |