Volvo 850 1996 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993

 
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 140 HP90 HP
Torque: 290 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds13.4 seconds
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo 850 engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1210 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1390 km on highway
1100 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km630'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S70Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.34 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo 850 is larger.
Volvo 850 is 38 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres466 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litres1426 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo 850 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Volvo 850 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 850 (by 154 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`695
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo 850, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 6.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv