Volvo 850 1994 vs Skoda Fabia 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo 850
1994 - 1997
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 126 - 250 HP50 - 130 HP
Torque: 170 - 350 NM84 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 - 12.1 seconds9.6 - 20.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 11.14.5 - 7.8
Volvo 850 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Volvo 850 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m3.96 m
Width: 1.76 m1.65 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Volvo 850 is larger, but slightly lower.
Volvo 850 is 71 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1016 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 850 has 195 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`821~ 1`579
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv