Volvo 850 1992 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 | 2.4 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 226 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 - 300 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 11 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.7 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Volvo 850 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is smaller. Volvo 850 is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
| |