Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |