Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Seat Alhambra 2000

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP115 HP
Torque: 202 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19.3 seconds13.7 seconds
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 25 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.2 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 45 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1080 km with real consumption970 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data256 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10002600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv