Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Citroen C8 2006

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Citroen C8
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP138 HP
Torque: 310 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds12.5 seconds
Citroen C8 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 23 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen C8. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.37.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1330 km on highway
980 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.73 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.73 m1.86 m
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller.
Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data480 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2948 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`530
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 26002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
Citroen C8 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv