Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Touran can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 5.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Sharan has 439 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`954 | ~ 2`178 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |