Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.81.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 90 - 204 HP115 - 204 HP
Torque: 170 - 310 NM170 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 17.2 seconds9.9 - 17.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 11.96.2 - 11.9
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 256 litres256 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`954~ 1`956
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons:
    Seat Alhambra has
    • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv