Volkswagen Touran 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touran engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 834 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1980 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Touran has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |