Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Renault Clio 2012

 
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2020
Renault Clio
2012 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP90 HP
Torque: 250 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds12.1 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.73.2
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1400 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1500 km on highway
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.06 m
Width: 1.75 m1.73 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo and Renault Clio are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1125 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 51 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`658
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 98009800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv