Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2019

 
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2021
Peugeot 2008
2019 -
Body: HatchbackCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP100 HP
Torque: 175 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.5
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1020 km on highway
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.30 m
Width: 1.75 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.53 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 25 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1125 litres1467 litres
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 342 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`715
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 980020 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Peugeot 2008 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv