Volkswagen Polo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018

 
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2018
Skoda Fabia
2018 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 95 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds14.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.8
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1070 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.00 m
Width: 1.75 m1.73 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 351 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1125 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 21 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5301`541
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 980014 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv