Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP100 HP
Torque: 125 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds10.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo 2005 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo 2001 engine produces 36 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo 2005, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2005. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 2001 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2005.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1150 km on highway
900 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo 2001 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1030 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 16002400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv