Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Volkswagen Golf
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP68 HP
Torque: 125 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds17.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.75.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1300 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m4.15 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 25 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1184 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 154 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`720
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv