Volkswagen Polo 2003 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
2003 - 2005
Volkswagen Golf
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 86 HP75 HP
Torque: 130 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds14 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1030 km on highway
720 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m4.15 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 25 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1185 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 155 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5801`640
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv