Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Skoda Fabia
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP65 HP
Torque: 112 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds15.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.9
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway880 km on highway
660 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.96 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1015 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`575
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv