Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Honda Jazz 2015

 
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Honda Jazz
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP102 HP
Torque: 95 NM123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.3 seconds11.2 seconds
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Honda Jazz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway930 km on highway
730 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 143 mm (5.6 inches)110 mm (4.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.45 m1.55 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres354 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1314 litres
Honda Jazz has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 362 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5701`605
Safety:
The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

high
Honda Jazz has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably better
Average price (€): 64009400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Honda Jazz has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv