Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Peugeot 301 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 33 HP more power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Peugeot 301. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 301 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 301, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 46 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 301. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`459 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |