Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 33 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1225 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 36 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |