Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 306 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 7 HP less power than Peugeot 306, but torque is 22 NM more than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |