Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 116 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds15.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo 1996 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo 2001, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2001. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo 1996 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo 1996 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo 1996 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway770 km on highway
530 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo 2001 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.90 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 18 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres975 litres
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1996 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means Volkswagen Polo 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`490
Safety:
Quality:Volkswagen Polo 2001 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo 1996 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo 2001, so Volkswagen Polo 2001 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv