Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 9.1 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 30 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1323 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |