Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 70 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 145 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | 10.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.6 | 5.2 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Peugeot 306. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1512 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`545 | ~ 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |