Volkswagen Lupo 2003 vs Audi A2 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 130 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Lupo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 30 HP more power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Audi A2. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Lupo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.53 m | 3.83 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller. Volkswagen Lupo is 30 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 390 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Lupo has 260 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`435 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Audi A2 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Lupo, so Audi A2 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Audi A2 has
| |