Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Volvo C30 2009

 
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Volvo C30
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP230 HP
Torque: 250 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds6.7 seconds
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 125 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.88.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1310 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1510 km on highway960 km on highway
940 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.27 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1270 litres921 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 129 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 349 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo C30.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`860
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf scores higher in safety tests, but Volvo C30 is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
high

below average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 90004800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Volvo C30 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv