Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volvo V40 1999

 
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Volvo V40
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP95 HP
Torque: 202 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds12.5 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 12 NM more than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1390 km on highway1300 km on highway
1110 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Golf is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 466 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1426 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`695no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800600
Rating in user reviews: 6.7/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv