Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volvo 850 1993

 
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP170 HP
Torque: 202 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds10.5 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.19.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1110 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat AlhambraInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.71 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller.
Volkswagen Golf is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 466 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1426 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Volvo 850 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Volvo 850 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv