Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is larger. Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 466 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1426 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |