Volkswagen Golf 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2000

 
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2006
Alfa Romeo 156
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP140 HP
Torque: 133 NM304 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.5 seconds9.8 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 72 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 171 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 8.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.26.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1120 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.43 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.47 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1470 litres1180 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 100 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 290 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`815no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.6/10 6.6/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv