Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 179 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 2 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.8 | |
| Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`087 | 2`385 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |