Toyota RAV4 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 114 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |