Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 24 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |