Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Toyota RAV4 torque is 2 NM more than Honda CR-V. Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 38 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 952 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 127 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |