Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 38 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 952 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 127 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |