Toyota RAV4 2009 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1752 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |