Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 177 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 - 400 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.3 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Toyota RAV4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Toyota RAV4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`134 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |