Toyota Camry 2001 vs Volvo 850 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 218 NM | 206 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Toyota Camry is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Camry engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Volvo 850. Thanks to more power Toyota Camry reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
The Toyota Camry is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Camry consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Toyota Camry over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Camry consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.40 m | |
Toyota Camry is larger. Toyota Camry is 16 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 445 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Toyota Camry can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |