Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Peugeot 206 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 19 HP more power than Peugeot 206, but torque is 2 NM less than Peugeot 206. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 992 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 41 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`421 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |