Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Toyota Yaris 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 286 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
528 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 75 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |