Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Kia Picanto 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 70 NM more than Kia Picanto. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 26 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 4 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |