Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 71 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Swift engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 43 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 266 litres | 168 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 98 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`240 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |