Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 94 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 190 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.6 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 26 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 4 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |