Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 94 HP | 90 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 190 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.6 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 133 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`581 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |