Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift 2013 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Swift 2013 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 94 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.5 | 5.0 - 6.4 | |
|
Suzuki Swift 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 - 140 mm (5.1 - 5.5 inches) | 130 - 140 mm (5.1 - 5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift 2013 and Suzuki Swift 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
900 litres | 512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |