Subaru Outback 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 1 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Subaru Outback consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Subaru Outback over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Outback consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
| |