Subaru Outback 2002 vs Subaru Outback 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 209 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 282 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback 2002 engine produces 36 HP less power than Subaru Outback 2004, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Subaru Outback 2004. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback 2002 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 2002 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback 2002 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2004. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2004, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2002 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |