Subaru Outback 2002 vs Subaru Outback 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Subaru Outback 2002 engine produces 9 HP less power than Subaru Outback 2003, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Subaru Outback 2003. Despite less power, Subaru Outback 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Subaru Outback 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback 2002 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback 2002 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Outback 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2003, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2002 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |