Subaru Outback 2009 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Outback has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |