Subaru Outback 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Outback engine produces 23 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, but torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Despite the higher power, Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Outback consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Outback consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
Subaru Outback is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 651 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |